No comments about Linear & Nonlinear Structural Mechanics.

5 comments about Using and Understanding Mathematics: A Quantitative Reasoning Approach.

1. I really like this book. I'm using it for an independent study class and it is ideal. I don't need to contact my instructor for clarification because it is well-written and has good examples.



2. I needed this book for class. The ISBN number matched perfectly the book was brand new. The price through AMAZON was less than buying from the school bookstore. THANKS! Amazon



3. Using and Understanding Mathematics is the worse math book I have ever opened in my entire life. Chapters 5 and 6 are definitely the worse chapters in the book. Chapters 5 and 6 deal with statistical reasoning, having taken a statistic course prior to this course I found that there were a lot of mistakes in the book. The explanation of surveying and opinion polls was extremely poor. The calculation of the confidence interval was not clearly defined neither was the discussion on choosing bias for samples, nor finding the significant point value within a given sample. I also felt the book did a horrible job at explaining the significance of standard deviation and did a poor job of explaining the 68-95-99.7 rule. On a good note I felt chapter 4 was very informal especially about how to calculate credit card debt, mortgage, and determine loan payments with just simple equations.



4. I ordered this textbook off of Amazon because it was cheaper than at my college bookstore. However, when I recieved it, I found that it was the Instructor's Edition. When I attempted to contact the seller, Lotus Books, to return it in exchange for the correct edition, my e-mail was ignored. I will never do business with Lotus Books ever again.



5. This is not really a review perse. I'm getting this book for a prereq in college. I'm just wondering if anyone knows the difference between the 3rd and 4th editions. Or is this another fantastic move of the publishing industry to save their lives/waste our money?

No comments about Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity (International Series of Monographs on Physics).

1 comments about Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics.

1. This book seems to summarize much of the research on this topic, but it does have some interesting aspects to it. It is not a physics book, but presents some information on certain specific uses, such as in biology, thermodynamics and a couple of other areas. But it is useful, esp in conjunction with the book by Miller and Ross. They complement each other well. For application it is a good book, but it does not have plug and chug equations in it.

No comments about Spectral Asymptotics in the Semi-Classical Limit (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series).

No comments about An Introduction to Semiclassical and Microlocal Analysis.

No comments about Geometry of Quantum Theory.

1 comments about An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics (Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics).

1. If you want a really well written explanation of what is a physical meaning of the MHD equations, what are the fundamental ideas behind them with examples from solar spots to metallurgical applications, nicely and clearly illustrated, this is the book for you.

   Congratulations to the author!

No comments about Renormalization: From Lorentz to Landau (and Beyond).

2 comments about Quantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions (Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics).

1. This is the outstanding reference and survey book for quantum gravity in 2 spatial and 1 time dimensions, and also has a number of Carlip's own recent contributions. When quantum gravity (QG for short) is restricted to 2 spatial dimensions, it simplifies analysis enormously, both physically and mathematically. I have cited Carlip's book both in papers delivered at conferences and in publications. Here is the opportunity to understand different schools of quantum gravity, including the Hawking-Hartle school and its comparison with the closely related Lortentian metric (v.s. Euclidean metric) school, the Ashtekar-Smolin loop school, the Wheeler-Dewitt equation school, the lattice school, the Feymann path integral school, the black hole entropy schools (to which both Carlip and Hawking/Penrose have contributed), various algebraic and topological schools, the incredibly rich moduli space and modular transformation results, and so on. Unlike most books, Carlip's is open minded regarding different schools, and gives comparisons and criticisms which are invaluable. The non-expert in quantum gravity would be well advised to start learning from this book and a few very clear mathematics and physics books (or to hire a consultant or even a tutor to explain prerequisites and some of the mathematical concepts in the book), because the average quantum gravity book is almost totally incomprehensible for non-experts compared with Carlip. I consider Carlip's clarity and comparisons between different schools to be far superior to even Hawking's, although of course Hawking is almost unrivaled as a physicist. The nearest you will come to Carlip's presentation is by reading hundreds of journal articles and books, which is impractical for most people.



2. When tackling difficult problems in physics, one of the most effective strategies is to study them in a domain or context where they appear more tractable. These strategies work best where there is a paucity of experimental data to guide the researcher through the conceptual search spaces where there is more temptation to engage in an excess of speculation. The quantization of gravity remains one of the most, if not the most difficult problem facing theoretical physicists today, and this in spite of much effort devoted to its resolution. Some researchers point to string theory as providing the correct path to quantum gravity, while others believe other less ambitious approaches show the most promise.
   
   In this book, which to some because of its publication date may be somewhat out of date, the author takes a direct approach to quantum gravity in a context where some of its difficulties are still manifest but where computations can be done. Lowering the spatial dimension by one in general relativity gives a theory that has no local degrees of freedom. This may cause some to think that the theory is basically trivial, and deserves no further consideration, but the author reminds the reader that when the spacetime has a fundamental group that is nontrivial, there are a finite number of global degrees of freedom. If the reader is familiar with some of the work that has been done in topological quantum field theory, the absence of physical degrees of freedom does not entail an uninteresting theory (both in physics and mathematics).
   
   Early on in the book, the author gives evidence as to the value in studying gravity in 2+1 dimensions, such as the fact that its point particle solutions are useful in the study of cosmic strings. But physical theories are very dependent on distance, as the discovery of quantum mechanics readily attests to. The cosmic strings the author discusses are entities that exist in the Newtonian limit of the (2+1)-dimensional theory. The physics at this scale (of "large" distances) is to be contrasted with the scales at which quantum gravity is thought to be relevant. Cosmic strings are not meaningful entities at these (very short) distances.
   
   Classical physics is thought to be better understood than the physics of the quantum realm, and so frequently physicists undertake a study of quantum phenomena by first investigating thoroughly what happens in the classical domain. The author does not deviate from this strategy, and early on in the book he takes up the study of the classical solutions of the Einstein field equations for (2+1)-dimensional general relativity. Since the dimension of space has been lowered by 1, one might expect that there would be a plethora of exact solutions to the Einstein field equations or at least ones that are somewhat easier to find than in the usual case. An immediate issue that arises concerns the topology of the manifold, and the author approaches this first asking what three-manifolds will admit Lorentzian metrics and which manifolds admit solutions of the empty space Einstein field equations, i.e. which three-manifolds admit flat Lorentzian metrics. An interesting conclusion resulting from this discussion is that changes in topology are not permitted by the field equations, at least for the case of spatially closed three-dimensional manifolds.
   
   Doing calculations in general relativity while respecting the unity of space and time is extremely difficult, and what is frequently done is to divide spacetime into spatial and temporal directions. One methodology for doing this is the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner (ADM) formalism, which is given detailed treatment in the book. The ADM formalism allows one to use the Hamiltonian formalism in (2+1)-dimensional gravity, and this results in a dynamical system with constraints. The author wants to interpret these constraints using an analog of what is done in a gauge theory, namely to interpret them as generators of infinitesimal gauge transformations, even though gravity is not a gauge theory. He shows explicitly that this can be done with the momentum constraints, but the Hamiltonian constraint is more problematic. This constraint generates diffeomorphisms in the time direction but "on-shell", i.e. subject to the dynamical equations of motion. But the author goes on to how diffeomorphisms can be represented as gauge transformations in (2+1)-dimensional gravity, i.e. in this case the full diffeomorphism group can be replaced by the group of pointwise gauge transformations. This makes the quantization procedure much more straightforward the author says.
   
   And after a few more chapters of studying the classical dynamics of (2+1)-dimensional gravity, the author gets to this quantization using the ADM formalism and the York time-slicing operation (the latter is a procedure wherein spacetime is given a "foliation" by surfaces with constant mean extrinsic curvature). This strategy allows one to reduce (2+1)-dimensional gravity to a purely quantum-mechanical system with a finite number of degrees of freedom. This is astonishing at first glance, and also quite helpful since it allows the author to use the familiar tools of quantum mechanics to quantize gravity. His discussion is interesting not only because of its importance to the subject of quantum gravity, but also because of the presence of various constructions from mathematics, such as the mapping class group and automorphic functions. The presence of these functions is due to the author's choice of a torus for the spatial part of spacetime. The Schrodinger equation then involves a Hamiltonian that can be written in terms of the "Maass Laplacian", the latter of which acts on the automorphic functions. The author however shows that this quantization procedure is not unique, with many choices of Hamiltonian possible, and each of these leading to physically inequivalent theories.
   
   This non-uniqueness in quantization procedures leads the author to consider, based on his study of the classical dynamics of (2+1)-gravity earlier in the book, alternative approaches to quantization. One of these alternatives is the viewing of the classical dynamics in terms of the geometry of flat connections. Rather than studying the evolution of the spatial geometry as done in the ADM formalism, this approach studies the evolution of the entire spacetime, and gives, as the author puts it, a kind of "Heisenberg picture" for the quantum dynamics (as compared with the "Schrodinger picture") of the ADM formalism. The quantization of the space of geometric structures (with nondegenerate metrics) is then carried out, interestingly without any need for a Hamiltonian. He also discusses how to proceed with the assumption of nondegeneracy of the metric, leading to the famous Ashtekar variables so widely used in some research circles in quantum gravity. Further analysis in a more general context, where the canonical quantization procedure of replacing Poisson brackets by commutators is replaced by a general operator algebra of holonomies leads the author to discuss the Nelson/Regge approach to quantization and its "dual": the famous Ashtekar loop representation.