5 comments about The Great Divorce.

1. Great story of imaginary trip to heaven by folks from the other place. Give humorous account of people who find the alternative of living in a heavenly place offensive and insist on returning to hell. Get character sketches.



2. One of C.S. Lewis's most striking traits is his ability to instruct with such a light hand that his touch is almost unfelt. This book is no exception. It lightly leads the reader from one thought to another; it shames, and it uplifts, and it entertains. After I finished it I sat and thought about it a while; it left me with a calm delight. Yes, I saw where I was lacking; but it also left me with the realization that I had a power to change my own future, if I changed some of my wayward behaviors.
   
   It's hard to leave a much longer review about it, in some respects. It is a short thing, but very powerful; I would suggest it to any Christian who wants to examine himself. Lewis seems to see clearly what others never see, and reveals important elements that I would never have thought two seconds about on my own.
   
   Try it. It may bore some readers; for others, it is an inestimably valuable little gem.



3. CS Lewis has forwarded his theory on sin, redemption & punishment with clarity, imagination & his trademark logic & reason - the proof in the book's success is its acceptance by atheist & religious communities alike. Whether you are religious/spiritual or not, Lewis challenges us at the universal level of human nature & this through our most common relationships: neighbors, children, spouses, parents. Lewis suggests that our relationships & attitudes within them reveal who we are & what we are becoming. Indeed, seemingly harmless, little attitudes & habits shape actions & character which then determine destiny.
   
   His vision of Heaven & Hell are credible in as far as they advise us on the benefit and detriment of daily choices. Lewis seems to believe that all sin is never really initially sin - it becomes sin when some attitude consumes us & controls us - Heaven & Hell are merely the continuation and magnification of the attitudes we chose to pursue in life. Righteousness is not a function of religion, but rather a function of true humanity & real life. Indeed he suggests that life isn't life at all without the honesty, humility & forgiveness we are offered & should offer. Qualities & ideals that no one would argue against.
   
   Finally, this book is an explanation of how God's love works. It can be the hardest thing to accept & yet is the greatest thing to accept. Lewis continues to offer the balance of God's responsibility & man's responsibility. He never leaves us enough room to blame anyone else for our choices but doesn't leave us without Divine help. A good book for the Christian Apologist or the person who is simply in pursuit of a better way of being.



4. It took me a long, long time to get through this short book. I had difficulty following all the thees and the yees, tracking the differences between the spirits and the ghosts, deciphering the solid beings from the translucent ones.
   
   I can sit through an amount of philosophizing; I don't think I can sit through much theologizing.
   
   But there are times when something--and the gift of this book is you feel it is addressed to you. . .the meddlesome wife. . .to you the vain artist. . .to you the knowing teacher--is said just right. Listen:
   "We met several Ghosts that had come so near to Heaven only in order to tell the Celestials about Hell. Indeed this is one of the commonest types. Others, who had perhaps been (like myself) teachers. . actually wanted to give lectures about it: they brought fat notebooks full of statistics, and maps, and (one of them) a magic lantern. Some wanted to tell anecdotes of the notorious sinners of all ages whom they had met below. . . `You have lead a sheltered life!' (these teachers) bawled. `You don't know. . .We'll tell you. We'll give you some hard facts.' . .All alike, so far as I could judge. . .were wholly unreliable, and all equally incurious about the country in which they had arrived. They repelled every attempt to teach them, and when they found that nobody listened to them, they went (away)."
   
   If you are a teacher--as I am--you should be arrested by the truth of that scold. So I plodded--at times reluctantly along a paragraph a day, a page a day--to get to the next bit of truth. And--at times--I was similarly arrested. Here, about the consequences of habitual "small" sin, listen:
   "I am troubled, Sir," said I, "because that unhappy creature doesn't seem to me to be the sort of soul that ought to be even in danger of damnation. She isn't wicked: she's only a silly, garrulous old woman who has got into a habit of grumbling."
   ". . .The question is whether she is a grumbler, or only a grumble. If there is a real woman--even the least trace of one--still there inside the grumbling, it can be brought to life again. If there's one spark under all those ashes, we'll blow it till the whole pile is red and clear. But if there's nothing but ashes. . .they must be swept up."
   "But how can there be a grumble without a grumbler?"
   "The whole difficulty of understanding Hell is that the thing to be understood is so nearly Nothing. But ye'll have had experiences. . .it begins with a grumbling mood, and yourself still distinct from it. . .Ye can repent and come out of it. But there may come a day when you can do that no longer. Then there will be no you left. . .just the grumble itself."
   
   I benefited from these, and similar insights, disappointed, though I was, in the book.



5. C.S. Lewis always fascinates. In this easy-to-read small volume, he takes us through a fictional dream about the afterlife. Starting in a dark, rainy and grimy town, he boards a bus that takes him and a number of grumbly souls for a trip to heaven. There, they meet relatives and friends who try to get them to stay. It's Lewis's perceptive genius that his lost souls are rarely inherently wicked, but have turned back on themselves and away from the ultimate source of love. There's the mother who demands to see her long-lost son; the wife who intends to continue improving her husband in the afterlife; the well-meaning religious person who is more interested in lecturing about God than experiencing God firsthand. To the saved, the dark town is only a purgatory - the place where they finally shuck their human attachments. To the lost, even heaven itself seems like hell, and they long to return to their gray and dismal existences.
   
   Other than a line or two here and there, as with the mention of Purgatory, there is little to indicate that this work was written by a committed Catholic. Frankly, you don't even have to believe in the afterelife to apprecciate Lewis's ability to see through human illusions and attachments. An interesting exploration of human frailty by a subtle and gifted writer.

5 comments about The Unmistakable Touch of Grace: How to Recognize and Respond to the Spiritual Signposts in Your Life.

1. This book has to rank as one of the top life changing books that I have ever read. Cheryl Richardson relays a philosophy and proven life techniques that will give you a completely new perspective on your problems, daily frustrations and goals in life. Reading this will help lay the ground work for leading a fulfilled, purposeful and successful life.



2. I love this book and ordered 3 copies which I promptly gave away to my friends. I'm getting ready to order 4 more.



3. This book is really amazing. I still use Cheryl's earlier book, Take Time for Your Life, as a great reference for my coaching practice. Her latest book takes you in another direction by showing you how to recognize and follow the signs of grace - "the recognition that everything is connected and sacred". I enjoyed hearing her personal story as well as that of others in their search for grace. It is a great example of how setting your intentions creates your reality. If that wasn't enough reason to read this book - she provides some great book, website and magazine recommendations. I would highly recommend this book. It could change your life... if you are ready for a change.



4. Cheryl Richardson has put into words what many of us have experienced in our lives but didn't know how to explain or articulate. This is not just another "how to" book on creating the perfect life. It is a book that will help you become more mindful of what is already present in your life. You won't miss another "signpost" after reading this book and you'll become more aware of how grace has been a presence in your life from the beginning. Bravo, Cheryl! Pamela D. Blair, Author, The Next Fifty Years: A Guide for Women at Mid-Life And Beyond, co-author I Wasn't Ready to Say Goodbye (Updated Edition): Surviving, Coping and Healing After the Sudden Death of a Loved One



5. It was truly a touch of grace for me to find myself watching Oprah (which I don't usually do)the day she had Cheryl Richardson, Martha Beck, and Louise Hay on her show. This book is wonderful, as is Martha's, and I have owned Louise Hay's book and given it to many friends over the past 25 or more years.
   
   "...Touch of Grace" is a very personal, easy to follow book. Common sense is not usually a phrase one applies to a book that is probably categorized as "spiritual" or "metaphysical" but this book just makes a lot of sense, and if one is truly open to looking at how grace has touched their lives and willing to be aware, this book will be a great help along the way...to...peace and serenity, joy, etc., etc.

5 comments about Sex God: Exploring the Endless Connections between Sexuality and Spirituality.

1. I may not be the most qualified reviewer of Rob Bell's new work "Sex God" provided the fact that I have only read the first half of the book. Moreover, I have limited exposure to Rob himself. While I have watched a couple of his NOOMA videos I have not read his first wrok, "Velvit Elvis." Nonetheless, this book is certainly captivating.
   
   From the on-set Bell demonstrates a command of his chosen writing style. His ability to shift, swerve, and fluctuate between poetry and prose all the while interjecting beautifully crafted simple and compound sentences is, well, very cool. I enjoy his writing. He makes me want to read his other stuff.
   
   As far as the content: as others have mentioned, "Sex God" may be little more than a shrewd marketing scheme. The book (so far) focuses less on the reality of sex in our lives and more on the God who created it. Furthermore, Bell attempts (and successfully I might add)to clarify the purpose of sex in our lives. It reveals our hearts. It reveals our relationship with others. It reveals our relationship with our Creator.
   
   I love how Bell, when discussing sexuality explicitly, explains our responsibility as human beings to understand how we were made to act sexually. We are neither animals-bodies with no spirit- nor are we angels- spirits with no bodies. We are human. In all of creation, we are the only beings with both bodies and spirits. We should view sex from this standpoint.
   
   Now attempting to explain Bell's insight on this subject and his compassion for his readers would be a heavy duty, something I am not equipped to do.
   
   I can say this: go out and buy this book! It will change your life!



2. Rob makes a great case for merging the physical and the spiritual. It's about much more than just our sexuality in relationship to our spirituality. Good book for challenging a small group to think through the ramifications of traditional thought systems.



3. The book was awesome and has great insight, and you can definitely learn a lot and be encouraged, but you should be real careful because some theological point are sacrificed a little bit or stretched to make other points. Other than that its a great read, fast read, and is definitely encouraging.



4. I would recommend "Sex God" to anyone really -- whether you're in a casual relationship or completely celibate. In the book, Rob Bell approaches the often-avoided topic of sex with practicality and an open mind.
   
   I didn't feel this book pushed a particular agenda or preached. It simply explored. Bell offers a range of ideas formed around the framework of a strong faith in God. What is sex? How is God expressed in sex? Is it OK for us to have sex? What does sex mean? All these urgent questions are approached tactfully and frankly at the same time.
   
   I enjoyed this read.



5. It isn't fair to critique a book I haven't read. That being said, the title and the contents offend me right from the start. "SexGod": It doesn't take a genius to observe our current culture and the trashiness that exists--and this "author" will join together in a title what humans have abused with the One who created it (to be enjoyed within the confines of marriage)?
   
   Have some RESPECT for the holy God!! The Jews, out of reverence for God won't even type or write out his name as we do. They will use G-d!
   
   And the name of the chapters: "God Wears Lipstick", "Leather, Whips and Fruit", "Whoopee Forever". No further comment.
   
   Just read the Bible! See our sin, and how a Holy God cannot have fellowship (connection) with sin, and how he provided redemption Rev. 5:9 "with your blood you purchased men for God". Read Revelation and how God has a future in Heaven, perfect, free from sin. Rev 4:8: "Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord God Almighty...".
   
   Whoopee forever? Not. Worship God forever, oh yes!

5 comments about Sacred Marriage.

1. I became a Christian just a few years ago after a strong dissatisfaction with Catholicism. I held lifelong fears and anxieties about marriage--I thought it was an institution to condemn women--but I thought this was an interesting approach to the subject so I picked up the book. Thanks to the author, I now feel worse. Not only is the book perpetuating the rampant sexism that exists in the church but every "Christian man" he talks about is a misogynist. The book itself is nothing but his bickers about his wife's "girlie problems" and he tries to-stupidly- generalize the experiences of all women. He even flat out declares that the genders are not and will never be equals! He also makes the idiot mistake of thinking motherhood is a peachy-keen walk in the park. This book went in the trash. God forbid I ever end up with a man like that--I'd rather stay single and go back to being secular where people are actually embracing the notion that men are supposed to be a part of the child rearing process (gasp!).



2. This is the best book I've read about marriage. It is very true, straightforward and practical, it cuts through the nonsense. Infinitely more revelatory and helpful than other books I've read on the subject.



3. This book has a great idea. God created marraige to help us grow as Christians even if it is painful and hard. So Practice your Christian values in your marraige. It is the best place to grow toward Christ. I just saved you from reading a long boring book where he goes on and on and on and on and on!! Save your money.
   Gabrielle



4. Good for any Christian's library. Good material even if one is not married. Relationally on all levels this can be applied.



5. My wife and I have gone through the first chapter and answered all the study questions. We both loved it! After doing the first chapter I feel that the principles so far are very biblical. The way Gary Thomas explains marriage helping us become more Christ like is very comparable to the way the Bible explains how trials and tribulations are used to strengthen us, if we allow it. If you are married then you will definately relate to the examples he gives. I already started to think about my selfishness in my marriage. I know this is something I need to work on, and im just thankful that this book is helping my wife and I to talk more about issues that we both think about but haven't really vocalized yet. Im excited to see how this book will help me focus on being more Christ like so i can also be a better husband and father.

5 comments about What's So Great About Christianity.

1. I will keep this review short and concise: Dinesh D'Souza will not be on any atheist Christmas Card mailing list, er, should I says Winter Solstice Card list. It has been said the greater the lie, the more some people will want to believe it. Atheism is so lacking in credibility, yet so many people ignore the truth and willfully adhere to this morally bankrupt philosophy. This book thoroughly demolishes the atheist viewpoint; it should be required reading at all universities, to offset the poison that the Liberal elites are forcing on students.



2. New atheists are here. But their arguments are anything but new. In his inaugural foray into Christian apologetics, D'Souza has done an outstanding job of synthesizing vast amounts of material and presenting it in a compelling narrative. The overall thesis is solid and well argued. Believers and skeptics alike will find plenty to think about in these pages.
   
   Welcome to College: A Christ-Follower's Guide for the Journey



3. D'Souza makes a great the case for the existence of God, while simultaneously tearing apart many of the common atheist arguments presented in other books. Not only does D'Souza make a clear and well researched case for the existence of God from the philosophically side of things, but he also uses plenty of historical and scientific examples to prove his point. These examples are also used to sweep away the perception that atheists are somehow smarter and more sophisticated than the believers out there.
   
   Through these historical examples D'Souza also demonstrates the many positive contributions that Christianity has made throughout history. He goes rights after the usual group of leftist myths that populate history textbooks and classrooms around the world. He debunks the so called "Dark Ages" and shows them in their true light as a time of innovation, science, economic growth, the end of slavery, and other positive accomplishments. Furthermore, over a span of three chapters D'Souza demonstrates how religion has been very supportive of science and not a hindrance to its development as you are taught in school with the leftist version of the Galileo affair. Additionally, the book clearly shows that overwhelmingly the greatest minds that have ever lived have been believers.
   Moreover D'Souza shows that the crimes of the Crusades, the witch hunts, and the Inquisition are grossly exaggerated and in many cases had nothing to with the Church or religion persecution. These crimes are always played up by those of the left and these terms have unfortunately made their way into everyday language. D'Souza nicely counters these false claims with the fact that the atheist left leaning regimes of the last two hundred years are in fact the ones who have committed the greatest crimes in human history. In terms of numbers, the crimes of atheist and anti-Christian regimes like the French Revolutionary government, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, and other leftists far dwarf anything that has been done in the name of Christianity.
   
   In closing as a strong believer, an engineer, and a history guy this book could not have made for a better read.



4. The author claims too much for Jerusalem and grants too little to Athens and Rome in the creation of Western Civilization, which to him is exclusively 'Judeo-Christian' civilization.
   
   D'Souza claims Christian origins for: limited government, human rights, the US government, and the scientific revolution.
   
   Since limited government was invented by the Greeks and adapted by the Romans before Christ, this is hubris.
   
   D'Souza claims that Christians invented religious tolerance. Never mind that there were dozens of religions coexisting in Rome and that Cyrus the Great exemplified religious tolerance in 500 BC.
   
   He references the Gospel of John's story that the universe was created through the Logos or divine reason, and claims that this lead to the expectation that the universe's working could be intelligible and so encouraged science. Never mind that the writer of the 4th Gospel was framing his theology in Platonic terms for the benefit of his Greek audience. The 'Christian' idea of Jesus as the Logos is just a recycled Greek idea.
   
   Closer to our own time, D'Souza quotes Washington and Adams to the effect that you can't have a Democracy without religion to keep us in line. He of course, avoids Madison and Jefferson. He makes the claim that the idea of human equality is Christian, even if the national documents make no explicit reference to Christianity, and Adams explicitly denied an explicit link.
   
   He makes the usual claims that atheists are immoral, that atheism was responsible for the crimes of both the Communists and the Nazis.
   
   The Communists killed to further their economic goals; atheism was incidental to their ideology. Even if it had been central, it would not follow that all atheists are Communists. Lack of belief does not make you a Marxist.
   
   It is also complete nonsense to call the Nazi's atheists, since atheists were among the first groups sent to concentration camps, the Nazi SS had 'God is With Us' on their belt buckles, Hitler was elected with the support of the Catholics. Whether Hitler was a 'good Catholic' or not, the Nazis saw themselves as defending Europe from godless Commmunism, which is why they had the support of the Vatican early on.
   
   D'Souza accepts the theory of evolution, but bolsters his scientific support for theism with the usual gaps in scientific explanation: the big bang, the origin of life, the origin of consciousness. Even if you reach for a supernatural explanation, at best these are claims for Deism, Christianity in particular does not follow from this.
   
   In the latter part of the book, D'Souza details Christianity and makes a pitch to the reader to accept it.
   
   D'Souza illustrates to me why Christians remain an existential threat to non-believers: They are fanatics who claim that history begins with them, that Western Civilization is synonymous with Judeo-Christianity and cannot exist without their religion in a privileged position, that our form of government is based upon Christian ideas (whatever the founders say to the contrary), that non-religious people are not moral, and that non-belief leads to ideologies that lead to the commission of mass murder.
   
   Essentially, D'Souza excludes you from full citizenship in your country or even identification with Western Civilization, claiming it as exclusively the province and product of his religion, and slanders you as at best amoral if not evil.
   
   What's not to like?



5. 
   I recently picked up a copy of What's So Great about Christianity (2007), by Dinesh D'Souza, and was pleasantly surprised at what I found. Although D'Souza's background is primarily in domestic policy, he has established himself as a significant apologist with the release of this recent book. In fact, What's So Great about Christianity is one of the most eloquent, researched and forceful responses to the recent barrage of anti-Christian books by Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and the like. While there are a few points of which I would disagree with D'Souza, his book is overwhelmingly an excellent and timely read.
   Even though these "new atheists" are making waves in the public arena like never before, D'Souza is convinced that atheism is on its way out. One of the most important developments of our time, according to D'Souza, is the global revival of religion. One of the reasons some atheists are making so much noise is because they are losing ground--hence, the renewed effort by atheists to explain away religion as a byproduct of evolution. Harvard's Stephen Pinker, for example, has suggested that evolution gave us a "God module" in the brain which predisposes people to believe in the Almighty. It may serve no purpose, says Pinker, as it may have evolved as a byproduct of other modules with evolutionary value. In simple terms, this means there is no evolutionary explanation. D'Souza asks a pointed question: "If a `God module' produces belief in God, how about a `Darwin module' that produces belief in evolution?" (15)
   D'Souza points out that many of the "new atheists" are not content in merely expressing their ideas--they want to take your children with them: "The atheist strategy can be described in this way: let the religious people breed them, and we will educate them to despise their parents' beliefs" (31). Defenders of the new atheism are quick to assert that they are not trying to inoculate kids, but merely stand up for science. But D'Souza points out that the wide majority of students are scientifically illiterate in all aspects of science. So, why isn't there a movement to teach photosynthesis, Boyle's law, or Einstein's theories, as there is for evolution? To D'Souza, the answer is simple: "This is why we have Darwinism but not Keplerism; we encounter Darwinists but no one describes himself as an Einsteinian. Darwinism has become an ideology" (32).
   Much of What's So Great about Christianity is an explanation of the positive aspects Christianity has brought to the world, and in particular, Western culture. Despite incessant claims in the media that religion is harmful, D'Souza powerfully defends the overwhelmingly positive legacy Christianity has had on the world. Consider a few points he brings out.
   1. Secular values are the products of Christianity, even if they have been severed from their original source. The separation of the realms of church and state has always been central to Christianity. In Matthew 22:21 Jesus said, "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and to God that which is God's." This is not the result of the Enlightenment.
   2. Christianity made family life far more important than it ever was in the past.
   3. Christianity shifted the focus from the rich and powerful to the common man.
   4. Christendom developed a new notion of romantic love.
   5. Christianity introduced consent as the prerequisite for marriage.
   6. Christianity introduced a new model of influence: servant leadership.
   7. Christianity brought a powerful emphasis on compassion.
   8. Christians built the first hospitals.
   9. The modern concept of freedom has been inherited from Christianity.
   10. Christians were the first group in history to begin an anti-slavery movement.
   11. Finally, Christianity brought true equality for all human beings, because of the doctrine of being made in the image of God. This laid the basis for all modern doctrines of human rights.
   
   Christianity and Science
   One of the reasons the "new atheists" are so confident is because they believe science is on their side. But with tremendous recent advances in our knowledge of the complexity and diversity of life, nothing could be further from the truth. It is also ironic that modern science is an invention of medieval Christianity. The greatest breakthroughs in scientific history have largely been at the hands of Christians. Atheistic scientists work under Christian assumptions (namely, that we live in a rational universe that operates according to laws which are understandable to the human mind), even if they deny them. D'Souza asks, "So where did Western man get this faith in a unified, ordered, and accessible universe? How did we go from chaos to cosmos? My answer, in a word, is Christianity" (93). Some of the leading scientists have been Christians: Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Boyle, Galileo, Pascal, Mendel, Pasteur, and more.
   In the middle chapters of the book, D'Souza makes a powerful case for design in the universe. He points to the beginning of the universe as compelling evidence for a creator: "In stunning confirmation of the book of Genesis, modern scientists have discovered that the universe was created in a primordial explosion of energy and light" (116). Even Einstein tried to avoid this conclusion because he knew that a beginning of the universe strongly implied a beginner. Amazingly, the Bible stands alone as the only ancient document positing an absolute beginning. What the Bible has held to be true for a few millennia now has powerful scientific support.
   D'Souza also points to the failure of naturalism to account for the fine-tuning of the universe as well as the origin of life. In fact, says D'Souza, these are problems for which naturalistic scientists are not even remotely close to solving. All explanations, such as the multiverse, are plagued with problems. Even biologist Franklin Harold admitted that the origin of life is one of the "unsolved mysteries of life" (147). The reason many atheists reject design in the universe is not for lack of evidence, but because of their pre-commitment to naturalism. Steven Pinker puts his cards on the table: "Because there are no alternatives, we would almost have to accept natural selection as the explanation of life on this planet even if there were no evidence for it" (160).
   
   Responding to Common Criticisms against Christianity
   Prominent atheists commonly object that Christianity has caused incredible bloodshed in the world. D'Souza makes a few key points in response. First, the crimes committed by religious fanatics pale in comparison to those committed by atheistic fanatics. In the 20th century alone, atheistic regimes were responsible for over 100 million deaths. Even if we compensate for higher population levels, the violence caused by Christian rulers over a 500 year period amounts to only 1 percent of the deaths caused by Stalin, Hitler, and Mao in just a few decades. Furthermore, atheism is intrinsic rather than incidental to their ideology. Some people have done some horrible things in the name of Christ, but clearly these actions go against his teachings. In other words, they were acting in spite of their convictions, whereas it can be argued that atheistic regimes, says D'Souza, acted consistently with their beliefs.
   
   Point of Disagreement
   One key point of which I disagree with D'Souza is his take on faith. He sees beliefs such as life after death and the existence of heaven as mere acts of faith, impossible to verify. Rather than being knowledge claims, he sees them as faith claims. In his view, faith takes over when knowledge ends. Thus, he defines faith as, "a statement of trust in what we do not know for sure" (195). While I agree that faith does not necessarily mean certainty, the Christian tradition is one of knowledge. Faith should more properly be understood as being built on knowledge. The disciples had faith in the God of the Bible, and they also believed that they could know it to be true. As J.P. Moreland points out in his recent book The Kingdom Triangle, the word "knowledge" appears far more often in the Bible than "faith." In fact, one in every four verses in the book of 1 John has the word, "know."
   There actually can be evidence for life after death, despite D'Souza's claim that it is merely faith. In Beyond Death, Gary Habermas and J.P. Moreland trace how there is scientific evidence for the continued existence of consciousness after physical death. And there can be evidence for heaven as well. Before his death, Jesus said that he was going to prepare a place for his followers in heaven (John 14:2-3). Any evidence, therefore, for the resurrection of Jesus counts in favor of the reality of heaven. These are minor points of disagreement, though. D'Souza is to be commended for a first-rate defense of the Christian faith. I highly recommend his book. And I hope this is the first of many to come.

5 comments about Shepherding a Child's Heart.

1. I have a feeling that people like Jo Ragan didn't really read the book, but glanced (if not just read the Table of Contents) and hastily decided that it was nothing more than a pages of utter trash.
   
   Now, I'm not a parent, but have had sufficient experiences with children and contacts enough to know a little bit about spanking. (Edit: and child-rearing) But first of all, we need to descry that spanking is not what Tedd Tripp advocates solely. Just declaring this book to be a 'spanking manual' is a gross generalization and a telling evidence that people need to be more cautious in reading books. Especially a valuable read like this. (And mind you, I don't know anything about Tedd Tripp nor am I his fan or associate. I'm a perfectly neutral third-party who has read the book.)
   
   If Tedd Tripp indeed advocates ONLY spanking, then why is there any need for him to mention God? And why do other chapters in this book discuss other methods and examine them? Mz. Ragan clearly did not read or pay attention while she was reading.
   
   Parents are tools that God uses and Tripp makes that quite clear enough. Parents are given AUTHORITY to exercise their stewardship; to guide their children to know the Lord (fear, love, seek, etc). NOT to be GOD themselves! (I guess reading between the lines can only go too far)
   
   People who dislike spanking and criticize the book for that reason only are missing Tripp's point as well. He clearly states in chapter 11, what the parents' reasons for 'the rod' should be; an instrument of 'wisdom', the fear of the Lord.
   
   If any true Christian has read the books of the Bible like Proverbs and TAKES THEM SERIOUSLY, he/she should not have qualms with Tripp's claim that 'the rod', or corporal punishment, does that quite effectively.
   
   Scripture:
   
   Prov 3:11-12 (NIV) My son, do not despise the Lord's discipline and do not resent his rebuke, because the Lord disciplines those he loves, as a father the son he delights in.
   
   And the discipline the children can receive need not be directly from God himself (often in forms of serious suffering) but can be learned from parents as well, who are not separate authorities, but derivatives of God's authority.
   
   We Christians must remember that God is not just God of mercy, compassion, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands (generations) and forgiving wickedness, rebellion, and sin.
   He is also the God who 'does not leave the guilty unpunished. He punishes the chilren and their children of the parents to the third and fourth generation.'
   
   If all Christians are preaching nowadays is universalism, pluralism, or modern/post-modern, humanist, secular understanding of humans, then Jesus has no place in anyone's lives and no Christian is Christian. The books of the Bible are not historicized fiction, fictionalized history, or some mythology or folk-ID forging. It is the Word of God, living and active, not like the rip-off Qur'an or any other human invented trash that God finds disgusting and revolting. It is the highest authority anyone can look to, not just some religious fanatical writing as many blind fools would like to believe.
   
   And I know that Tedd Tripp has done quite a wonderful job in addressing the Word of God wisely in terms of parenthood, an important aspect of Christian stewardship.



2. This is a good book but if you want an invaluable resource for raising children To Train Up a Child by Michael Pearl is even better. It is clearly the best resource a parent can have if they truly love their children. I am well aware that many people who do NOT do their homework say it is bad but if you ask them if they have read the book they almost always say NO! If you train the child with love you will DISCIPLINE 90% less than if you do not.



3. I had no idea how many things I was doing wrong!!! And everyone thinks I am a good parent. By the worlds standard, I suppose I am. By Gods standard I was falling way short! Ted Tripp has shown me how to be kind and loving to my children. To explain to them why we do what we do, not just because I want it, but, because God calls up to do it! What a concept! IF YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN PARENT, THIS IS A MUST READ! I am enjoying parenting so much more, now that I am in line with Gods will!



4. The Pearls are Christians that advocate beating children. Tedd Tripp's book is more insidious than that because it seems reasonable, but it's the same idea dressed in sheeps clothing. The theology is basically "beating the sin" out of your child- which isn't Christian at all!! I recommend something more along the lines of "Grace Based Discipline".



5. Not only does this book give you insight for raising Godly children, it challenges you to become a better example to your children and correct the things in your life that are not Christ-like.

5 comments about Walking with God: Talk to Him. Hear from Him. Really..

1. Since starting with Wild at Heart, I have read all of John Eldredge's books and found them all to be a challenge to my previous beliefs. They took me away from traditional theology and on the path to understanding myself and my relationship with God.
   
   Walking with God is a marvelous book with many great stories within it. I still have trouble with getting God's voice on the mundane decisions in life, but without question it is the way to hear the important answers to your most intimate questions.
   
   I have read the book once and suspect that with all of his other books it needs to be read 2 or 3 times to get the full impact.



2. Not many books have serious, realistic discussion about a person's relationship with God. This book does. It describes ways to pray, listen, and hear the reply. This doesn't promise unrealistic results and this isn't the usual "you should pray this" kind of book. It's the author's actual communication, his questions and answers, and how he learned to ask questions of God and hear the reply.
   
   All that doesn't do justice to the book. Put simply, if you wish to examine ways to improve your relationship with God through prayer, read this. After picking this up at the library, I'm buying my own copy.



3. The author, John Eldredge is easy to read and for those dear souls in search for community with Christ, the son of the Christian God; they will be aroused to seek Christ more intimately. A good beginning in the spiritual quest for ever more intamacy. John's other books will necessarily follow in your continued reading on this subject and you will be enlightened by his prophetic intuition.



4. What is it like to hear from God? What does His voice sound like? What does conversational intimacy with the divine look like? John Eldredge, author of the bestselling WILD AT HEART and EPIC, answers these and other questions in his latest book, WALKING WITH GOD.
   
   Instead of chapters, Eldredge cleverly divides the book into four seasons representing a year of simply living as a follower of God. Within each season he explores different moments with life and faith intersecting and how God reveals himself at such times. Eldredge writes:
   
   "It is our deepest need, as human beings, to learn to live intimately with God. It is what we were made for. Back in the beginning of our story, before the fall of man, before we sent the world off its axis, there was a paradise called Eden...And what they enjoyed above all the other delights of that place was this --- they walked with God. They talked with him, and he with them."
   
   From this foundation, Eldredge goes into extremely specific moments when he cries out to God and shares the replies, if any, that are given. Along the way he provides scripture references as a backdrop for his interactions with God. He notes that it's important to slow down to listen to God. With the speed and noise of our modern world, many voices are trying to get our attention. In order to hear God's voice, we have to be intentional and still. Eldredge describes sitting quietly and asking God how he should spend the weekend --- at his ranch or at home. Then he describes placing the question before God, searching his own heart, and bringing his soul to a "posture of quiet surrender." In the end, he hears God say, "Yes --- go. It will be good."
   
   When he gets to the ranch, Eldredge is disappointed that it's raining. The weather further forces him to slow down, reflecting on the busyness of his life and drivenness of his own soul. Ultimately, he ends up discovering more about himself and God in the process. Such descriptions are intensely personal, and Eldredge goes out of his way to make sure readers don't try to create formulas out of his experiences. Rather, he encourages them to go and develop their own relationship with God one on one.
   
   Eldredge's background in counseling is readily apparent as the book progresses. In the section "Fall," he examines some of the deeper heart issues, including the agreements people make with things that simply aren't true. He goes on in "Winter" to describe the devil as an "opportunist" and explores the snare of "speculation." Charismatic readers will resonate with many of his teachings in these areas, but mainstream ones will enjoy Eldredge's down-to-earth style and desire for God.
   
   WALKING WITH GOD raises a lot of theological questions without providing tons of answers, and maybe that's okay. It is not designed to be a treatise, but rather one candid look into a year in the life of a man sincerely seeking God. Not everything is relatable or attainable. But most will have their spiritual lives challenged and encouraged by reading this book. Highly recommended to long-time fans of John Eldredge and anyone wondering how to hear God's voice.
   
   --- Reviewed by Margaret Oines



5. It's hard not to enjoy the works of John Eldridge. He has his finger on the spiritual pulse of what it means to strive to be a godly man. Treat this book as a daily devotional because there are truly heartfelt and personal thoughts that John has depicted as a daily personal journal. He has also created a unique format that includes a live video of select entries from John's teaching on this personal journal. Oswald Chambers gave us an daily look at scripture and its application that became a classic devotional component to the Bible. Walking with God has that similar appeal presented in a more contemporary framework that allows us peer into his heart to see what it means to actually walk with the Master.

5 comments about The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief.

1. I honestly highly recommend this book. I have been reading books on atheism lately by Dawson and Harris, among others, and I must admit I find the arguments by atheists convincing and strong. It is a relief to read Collins' book.
   
   The author was first an atheist, having been convinced during his scientific education that there is no place for God in this world. However, he soon realized that science cannot replace God. In fact, science re-enforced his belief in God. Collins explains that as a Christian believer, "the experience of sequencing the human genome, and uncovering this most remarkable of all texts, was both a stunning scientific achievement and an occasion of worship."
   
   The author spends quite a long time on evolution, explaining how evolution re-enforces the existence of God. Atheists always use evolution as a major proof that there is no God. Collins believes in evolution, but concludes that there must have been a force to put evolution in motion. In other words, there must have been a creator.
   
   "In my view," Collins goes on to say, "DNA sequence alone, even if accompanied by a vast trove of data on biological function, will never explain certain special human attributes, such as the knowledge of the Moral Law and the universal search for God." Collins insists that "science is not threatened by God; it is enhanced" and "God is most certainly not threatened by science; He made it all possible."
   
   According to the author, pain and suffering, so ever present in the world, does not mean that there is no God. Many atheist authors have argued that if God really existed, He would not have allowed suffering. But the author explains that this is not necessary true. In fact, the author's daughter was raped when she was a teen, but this in no way convinced him that there is no God. Why God permits the suffering of innocents is a puzzle Collins does not pretend to solve, although he speculates, following C.S. Lewis, that we may need to suffer in order to learn. I found his arguments very convincing.
   
   Reason persuaded the author that the universe could not have created itself. C.S. Lewis was influential to the author, and like Collins, Lewis was atheist before embracing God. After reading this book, I am encouraged to read C.S. Lewis' books.
   
   Indeed there is wisdom in the written word. But take care; words are mightier than the sword! Choose your side carefully.



2. Collins has credibility as a internationally recognized scientist and as a thoughtful individual with a strong religious conviction. This book provides explanations to address perceived conflicts between science and religion. I believe people that question their faith, as science reveals more truths about the world around us, will find this a very helpful book. In addition, Collins thoughtfully and logically debunks Intelligent Design and Creationism, two errant theologies that produce unnecessary schisms between science and religion.



3. I went into reading this hoping to come back to Christianity after a long walk away from it. However, after reading this book I was left unconvinced and with little reasoning in why the Christian God was the right choice, as well as why a loving God is even worth believing in. Even Collins asserts later in his book that science has done a good job explaining creation without the need of a creator, he completely acknowledges that it is faith alone that truly guides one in believing in their God. This is nothing new, various religions and preachers have always emphasized that it all relies on faith. I would say the only thing new I learned in this book is the process of cloning. Collins gives a great detail of explanation of Dna, evolution, cloning, and the big bang. I would even say he explained the science portion a lot better than his theory that Altruism is divine. Trust me, I was hoping to be convinced, I was hoping to find truth, I like Collins I really do, it is just in this case, this book will be used purely as a reference in understanding certain aspects of science and never quoted for matters of religion. I am giving it 3 stars just for the detail of the science it presented. Also If you are interested in what Sam Harris has to say here is the link...warning though, he is very disrespectful in his critique....[...]



4. A scientist does a thorough job of explaining God in a way that clears the smoke from those who claim that religion and science are incompatible.



5. This is an excellent read (or listen). I bought the audio book. This book is very intelligent and thought provoking. While I don't agree with many of Dr. Collins assumptions or positions I truly loved the science behind the book. This is a must read for anyone interested in the creation of life. Actually it is a must read for anyone who likes to read an intelligent, well written book. A word of caution; in the audio book Dr. Collins takes to singing a home brewed song. I seriously doubt if Jon Bon Jovi will have any of his fan base eroded when the listeners get a listen! That was a quasi joke!
   Tom Acierno - Author of A Whisper In God's Ear

5 comments about 23 Minutes in Hell.

1. This is a very well written book, very scarey, yet also believable. Although his experience is certainly different from what I would have imagined, the author writes from a solid Biblical position, with many, many Scriptural references to back his experience. It is an eye opener for anyone who does not believe in a literal hell, but also an eye opener for the believer in hell. One wants to think that Hell will not be that bad. Definitely worth the read.



2. Initially, I bought this book thinking "alrighty then, what are the fanatics trying to scare potential Christians off with now?(God love 'em)". But hey, I thought, it's worth checking out as I'm trying to reason with a loved friend about accepting Christ through scientific & historical evidence as well as my personal story. WOW! Bill's experience is real and what an honor to have been chosen for God's purpose in letting all know that hell is a real place! Bill identified with the skepticism I had. He explained of his conservative nature and how he would have never chosen to be associated with something like this (his wife's trustworthy account included). This is the scariest book I have ever read (up until that point) I know I was meant to read it & pass it on. It's scary because it's REAL and worse than any horror movie I have ever seen (although I don't watch them anymore). Thanks Bill & Annette for your honest accts. Bill's story lit a fire under this Christian's tail. I don't want anyone I know or don't know to go to hell and neither does God. It's hard to believe ppl still choose to die without God & Jesus! None of God's children are "sent" to hell, they choose hell! Why??? Please read this book & come to accept before it's too late! And Bill and Annette, thanks for being so brave & trusting the Lord enough to tell the story He meant for you to tell. I really appreciated the biblical references throughout. I even purchased some of the books listed in the bibliography. God has blessed me as a well-educated, science/math teacher who places high value in critical thinking and scientific evidence, but I'm no skeptic when it comes to intelligent design... anymore anyway. People, please don't let pride & evil blind you & harden your hearts! Read the book with an open mind. Pray for God to show you the truth. The Lord, God Jesus said: "Behold, I stand at the door [of your heart] and knock. He who hears my voice and opens the door, I will come into him [or her]." Rev. 3:20 God doesn't lie & he will show you the truth. "He loves each of us, as if there were only one of us to love." ~Saint Augustine. Just knock!
   If you're a skeptic needing proof that God really exists read "The Case for Faith" and "The Case for Christ" by former atheist Lee Strobel. Follow along with a Bible. You will find astounding scientific and historical evidence for the existence of God. Heaven and hell do exist! Why play games with eternity? The Lord is knocking and the hour is late, Only through God's gift in Jesus Christ can we enter into Heaven. So read this eye-opening book & pass it on!!! Out of love, I pray for each of you who has yet to be saved, that God will show you the truth and that your eyes will be opened.



3. A Walk Through Life23 minutes in hell is a nightmare of an experience beyond words for anybody to go through. 23 minutes in hell is a warning that an afterlife really does exist and it's our choice to believe, have faith, confess our sins and change our ways before it's too late. This book surely is a message from God to save our souls. Bill Wiese had a terrible journey in hell and shares with us in great detail exactly what it is like to suffer for 23 minutes.



4. This book draws attention to what the Bible/God says about Hell. Hell is a real, horrible place for all who reject Jesus Christ and the salvation he provided for mankind by dieing on the cross for our sins. He went to hell for us and suffered so we don't have to. Bill Wiese's experience lines up with the Word of God. It is an awesome book and I recommend it for everyone that has not yet confessed Jesus as their Lord and Savior. It's also great for the person who is "saved" because you will appreciate and be so much more grateful for your salvation through Jesus Christ. Those who believe in Jesus as their Lord and Savior don't have to fear hell but those who reject Christ need to seriously think about where they want to spend their eternity. This book will definitely help you make a wise and educated choice. My prayer is that you will "Choose Life" through Jesus Christ.



5. Obviously because he says that he went to hell in an out-of-body experience makes it absolutely true despite the fact that nobody can confirm or deny that it actually happened.

5 comments about Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine.

1. A friend who attended seminary and learned under Dr. Grudem introduced me to this book. I have read it nearly two times through so far and anticipate reading it periodically for the rest of my life. Besides the Bible itself, this is the most influential book I've ever read. It has profoundly affected my theology. I am most impressed with how Dr. Grudem always proves every conclusion through the scripture itself. There are no personal opinions or beliefs or convictions in this book, only conclusions one reaches with Dr. Grudem by systematically studying the scriptures with him. If only everyone would be so willing to let the Bible itself do the talking for God.



2. This is the most biblically accurate, readable, best structured, thought provoking, quick reference-friendly Theology book that I have ever seen. Grudem is thorough and concise. Even the the set up in the book is eye-friendly. You don't have to hold a Doctorate in Theology to understand it either. He writes in terms that any adult Christian should be able to understand. And he wrote some smaller versions of it so you can pass out to those who may be intimidated by the full text version.



3. Having spent a few months working through Grudem's Systematic Theology, I'm convinced it is a very important book. I think this will go down in church history as one of the best systematic theologies ever written, and can easily hold its own place on a shelf with works by Calvin, Gill, Henry and Poole. It's a great book to read straight through (if you have a lot of time on your hands) or to use as a reference for specific topics or questions you may have. It's laid out very well, user friendly for laymen, and has great supplementary info at the end of the chapters as well as at the back of the book. A great Reformed theology textbook and a great gift for any believer, whether in seminary or not. Youth pastors should be teaching this book instead of hosting gatherings for playing air hockey and eating pizza.



4. Fantasticly easy to read systematic theology with some challenging questions at the end of each chapter.
   Can't say I liked the hymms section because I didn't really know any of them to be honest (pentecostal / charismatic background sorry) but would be helpful to some.
   
   I've tried reading a few systematic theologies before like Berkhofs, Hodge, Torey and even Calvins Institutes. All hopeless complex and I found myself stuggling. Grudems book is great for students who want a good understanding of Christian theology, but don't want to spend hours struggling with Archaic language and overly scholarlised books.
   
   Grudem has a gift for making complex assertions simple facts. The other guys seem to do things the other way around. Not that there isnt any value in the other authors, but for me I found this book most helpful.
   He is quite conservative and rigoursly biblical. Its not an historical or philosophical theology either so it should be renamed biblical theology.
   
   Well worth it, its a massive book and its heavy. make sure you get a hardcover version, softcovers just wont cut it!!



5. This a fantastic book!,Imagine a book on Theology for everyman to enjoy,From the scholar to the layperson,everyone can enjoy understanding who God is.And this gentleman seems to write from a perspective of really loving God and people too,without any desire to impress anyone with his knowledge as Mr Grudem could easily do,This is a masterpiece and I cannot overemphasize how enjoyable and solid this hefty volume is,We need more men like this to break down these wonderful truths for us and yet they are still as meaty and can be as deep as you need to go with them,I thank my God for using Mr Grudem to bring this to us,all Glory to Him!!