5 comments about Namo WebEditor 2006.

1. I bought Namo 5.5 several years ago when I needed support for non-Latin alphabets to do a Russian website. I gradually used it to change my various sites (about 22). Recently I noticed a HUGE flaw in WebEditor 2006 and it is also in Namo 6--Global Search & Replace adds a space after EVERY double quote (ASCII 34). Even if that is not what you are replacing! What is the reason? Internally, instead of storing & quot; it only stores & quot (SOMETIMES). I have one site with over a HUNDRED pages. GS&R screwed up almost ONE-THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED double quotes! Today I found a spelling error (on every page) and tried to use GS&R. It screwed up the double quotes again, so I loaded the backup and I'll have to change them all manually. On the plus side, when I finally got disgusted of trying to get a response from Namo, which has had my tech support request on this "in progress" for 2 months, I looked at several other editors and didn't find anything better in this price range. My advice? If you are doing a simple website and don't need templates, etc., (which don't work so well with Namo anyway), download Netscape 7.2 for free, which includes and HTML editor. Regarding Namo's built-in templates, most of them are terrible although they are signficantly improved over Namo 6. They're fine if you want to produce a personal website but they just don't look professional. Regarding the free WebCanvas graphics editor, if you can figure out how to use it, I'd sure like to know. You can download WE2006 from Namo's website, which should convince you to look elsewhere.



2. I have used Namo WebEditor since v 5.5. For the money, I think this a fast, easy, dependable editor. For my modest site editing needs it is every bit as capable as Dreamweaver. I have also tried DW, FP, Nvu, GoLive, and Mozilla, plus a couple of others I can't recall (that's how memorable they were). IMHO, WebEditor 2K6 Rocks!
   
   The multiple interface (Edit, Html, or edit/html) make designing your web site easy whether you like drag-and-drop or using code.
   
   In "Edit" mode the word processor-like interface makes web page design drag-and-drop simple. (And easier than working in Word at times.)
   
   If you prefer to use code, you can do that too. You can also use a split screen to see the code as you create.
   
   Despite what some reviewers have said, this program is rock solid on my computer. I have never had it crash, and the FTP client included works flawlessly.
   
   I can't comment on the Tech Support, because I have never needed it. The help screens are all that I've needed. (I don't have the manual, because I downloaded my copy from Namo.) BTW - I always save a copy of downloaded progs and serial nos. separate from my operating system drive, and burn them to a CD...just in case.
   
   If you are looking for a modestly priced web editor with lots of capability, I think you should give this one a try.



3. I downloaded their Vista patch, which says it fixes a problem where Vista reboots when the program is installed. Not launched. INSTALLED.
   
   Of course, installing the patch fails because it says the program isn't installed.
   
   Guess what happened when I tried installing, because I assumed the wording was due to imperfect Korean->English translation? It rebooted.
   
   No, it seems the linguistics were just fine. The logic of the programmers still leaves a lot to be desired, however. I had used this product 'successfully' on XP, but agree with the other commenters here about stability and poor customer support.
   
   Not to mention the program does generate a LOT of bloat. FrontPage may be Microsoft-centric, but the bloat isn't as asphyxiating as Namo's offering... especially with CSS... (FrontPage ignores it; Namo's needs manual tweaking or else it'll repeat every CSS entry...)
   
   [...].



4. I started with v. 5, used 5.5 and 6, and am trying the 2006 demo to see what's really different.
   The pluses: This is easier to learn and far cheaper than Dreamweaver and has features Dreamweaver does not, built-in scripts being one of them.
   The minuses: As many say, I found there is no customer support. My current version, (6) blows up every now and again, when deleting something. Also, sometimes when working in WYSIWYG mode it will sometimes start throwing in hard spaces ( ) between words which means they will not wrap.
   They recently released or are about to release "WebEditor Professional." In the Namo forum, one of their alleged support techs said it is not an upgrade, just a repackaging. Another forum user says v. 6 is unstable and 2006 is good. I just have not seem much change from 6 to 2006 so I have not bought it yet.
   I bought an OEM of DreamweaverMX real cheap when they came out with the next edition and still find it to be a steep learning curve and lacking in features that Namo has. I seldom use Dreamweaver.



5. The problem with Namo is that bugs abound in their software and there is poor customer service. The bugs that I have encountered are so inconsistent that it is really hard to say what causes them to occur. It seems that every so often a rollover goes dead. There is also a problem with saving different changes of files under different names... etc etc. If you go online for help -the moderators are likely to answer a question that you didn't ask and close the issue immediately.
   
   However, despite the bugs -this webeditor is well priced. If you persevere through all the issues and learn a little manual HTML -you will have a working website.
   
   However I must stress that if this were my only tool for mantaining and updating a website -I would seek another one. This is not a professional product and more suited for someone who is learning about websites.

2 comments about Flash 5.0.

1. With Flash 5 (which is at the time of writing in beta only), Macromedia appears to have attempted to further bridge the gap between its original primitive proprietary functionality (in its previous life as FutureSplash) and the overall Macromedia interface; this gap has in the past often impeded usability and defied intuition. The most robust overhaul has been made on the behaviours and actions... it is much easier to tailor Flash to do what you want without having to rely solely on readymade (and often generic) functions embedded within Flash. This of course makes it that much more difficult to get the ball rolling for novice users, but for more advanced users this will open a world of opportunity. In this way it is somewhat similar to Director in the way it manages operations/functions; you can insert pre-fab functionality or develop your own, dependent upon your skill level.

   The drawing tools have been changed to incorporate vector tools, with a Bezier pen tool that will make any Flash user's life much easier. It is no longer so crucial to have a drawing program open as you work, although these tools are still not quite up to the standards set by FreeHand and Illustrator.

   One nice aspect of the changes made to the interface of the application are that it neither adheres strictly to the FreeHand system nor is totally different... by this I mean that those comfortable with FreeHand or Illustrator will both be able to use the new interface with relative ease. Say goodbye to the awful, cumbersome application that was Flash 4. There are many more options for floating palettes that permit a greater ease of editing and doing things on the fly, whereas before Flash usually required dragging down menus and calling up dialog boxes.

   Whether or not Flash 5's improvements will make it an optimal work environment remains to be seen; I've only scratched the surface of the application, because, after all, the surface is what is most immediately different. Certainly there are going to be hindrances and bugs under that surface, but hopefully they will be few and far between.




2. OVERVIEW: Flash 5 represents a significant upgrade from its predecessor, making it a "must have" for any serious web developer who wants to develop high-impact web content. The improvements are not superficial, instead Flash 5 impressively enhances the developer's ability to design, develop, and deploy. This tool is the resource for anyone who is serious about Flash and maximizing its amazing potential at a rapid pace.

   At RAYHAWK.COM we have been using Flash to enhance our web productions for the last 2 years and the results have been noticeable, not only to us, but to our clients (KFC, Taco Bell, BMW, Porsche, Deltamedical.com).

   WHY FLASH? With Flash player's pervasive presence in a majority of all browsers, Macromedia's Flash has become the industry standard for delivering high-impact web animations and dynamic site content.

   THE COMPETITION: What competition? Macromedia is the creator and leader of this technology and Flash is the master of this domain with no other product coming even close to its innovation and power. Adobe's marginal attempt to introduce a competing product with Live Motion was not well received by developers and is comparatively lacking in features. The most significant proof that Flash owns this entire arena is that even competitor wanna-be, Live Motion features Flash animation (*.swf) as an export format because Adobe is painfully aware that nobody would invest in their product if it did not support Flash.

   FLASH 5 FEATURES:

   1. POWER LIBRARY - Flash's Library feature has received a big boost in version 5. The library allows users to reuse graphics and buttons repeatedly with a minimal increase in the final file size. In Flash 5 multiple developers can share the symbol libraries. Now revising the placeholder graphics into the final artwork on one system, will ripple back to all other Animators document instantly... a great feature for multi-group workflow.

   2. ADVANCED ACTION SCRIPTING - resembling Java-script, the scripting can be created and edited in any text/html editor and imported into Flash for use; old script can be viewed without searching through frames of individual code-chunks.

   3. ENHANCED INTERFACE - many controls are now available in dock a able palette, which ultimately allows more development efficiency.

   4. FULL BEZIER SUPPORT - but its gets better... the option to draw with the traditional pencil is retained allow optimal developer flexibility.

   5. POWER EDITING - the developer is now permitted to instantly edit what they want and where. Endlessly searching a document's layers of imbedded symbols is over. A hierarchical tree allows for easy navigation and editing of flash symbols.

   6. HTML EMBEDDING - To really change the balance of power Flash 5 makes it possible to imbed actual HTML pages within Flash Documents so now sites will become Flash shells with HTML inside, rather than vice-versa.

   7. NO LOST VISITORS - Publish html that detects if your visitors have Flash 5 player and automatically directs them to Macromedia's download center if needed.

   8. OTHER ENHANCEMENTS - improved XML transfer support within documents; improved integration with Freehand and Generator; seamless importing of MP3 soundtracks; and exporting to QuickTime.

   CONCLUSIONS: At RAYHAWK.com we have used Flash technology to successfully enhance our projects and exceed our client's expectations for the last 2 years. With the launch of Flash 5 Macromedia has solidified its position as the premier developer of powerhouse web content. Macromedia Flash 5 is an outstanding upgrade for any developer already using Flash and for those newcomers to the web arena this is AN ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT!!!

No comments about T3 Security Suite with usb Key Includes $1500 Of Theft Insurance.

No comments about Microsoft Office FrontPage 2003.

5 comments about SJ Namo WebEditor 6 Suite.

1. This is not worth your money. I should have done more research on this before buying this. Honestly, sometimes I feel like tearing my hair out with frustration. I will give it one star because there isnt anything lower than this.
   
   Its not very user friendly, it retains the properties of the latest page that you worked on and there are some properties, I havnt figured out how to change yet. Take for example, images in the editor windows started showing up as and empty box with an X in the corner, instead of an image. It started after I tried to use one of their templates to play arround. I do not know how to change this back. Its frustrating because even though, it shows up as a image on the preview window, it doesnt do so on the editing window. They do not have any tech support number to call. The templates are medicore or of lower quality. Frankly,I have seen share wares do a lot of what you can do with this.



2. I have used Namo WebEditor for two or three years, starting with version 5, then 5.5, then 6. The reviews here seem to be either raves or trashes.
   Namo is a good product but it has deficiencies. I found no bugs in versions 5 and 5.5 but 6 had a few, particularly in loading pages made with 5 or 5.5. I installed the patch and have had few problems since. I keep 5.5 on the machine if I need it.
   There are a few things that don't work well so I've been thinking of buying Dreamweaver. I would have by now if (1) it were reasonably priced, and (2) it were not so difficult to learn. The other programs in the Namo suite are buggy or of little value. Posts on the Namo website forum repeatedly trash the product support. I've not had to use it but I've had bad experiences with support from Dell, Microsoft and other companies. Does anyone have good support any more?
   Some of Namo Web Editor's plusses: (1) There are four viewing modes; Dreamweaver has three. To preview in DW you must save, open a browser and load the file in that. In Namo you can preview by clicking a tab. (2) There are built-in scripts (javascript) that are easy to use. Some don't work right. (3) There are many sample pages that you can modify and use. I think the designs are awful. (4) There is a fair collection of clip art, photos, graphics and other items that can be used in your pages. The buttons can be edited for color, text, size, etc. (5) Namo's window can be sized to the most common screen settings (eg. 600 X 800 etc.) so you can easily know how much of the page won't be seen by people who set screen resolution for large displays.
   I have not found above items 2, 4 and 5 in my uses of Dreamweaver. I don't think they are available in Dreamweaver.
   I have made many pages with Namo, accept its shortcomings, and have no problems with it. Maybe I've been lucky as far as the bugs are concerned.
   A new version (Web Editor 2006) is shipping and is being roundly trashed in the forums on the Namo website. Apparently it is not much different from version 6, and has several bugs.
   I will continue using and enjoying Namo 6 (with 5.5 on standby) until I have learned more about Dreamweaver and can buy a leftover prior version at a reasonable price. I've downloaded Dreamweaver's 30-day trial three times and am only now starting to feel comfortable with it. It does have a good tutorial but there is a lot to learn.
   If you are considering buying Namo, look at Dreamweaver and Netobjects Fusion 8 as well. Trial versions are available from all three (go to the respective website). Dreamweaver is the most complex and most difficult to learn; Fusion is probably the easiest to learn, by far, but Namo may do more.
   If Namo installs properly, works well and you can learn it, it will do a great job for you. If you are a beginner, get "HTML for Dummies" along with whatever program you get.



3. Amazon should allow us to vote ZERO stars.
   
   Please do NOT purchase this software. While it has many desireable features at an affordable price it is not worth the money. It is a simple program to master but it has a great deal of software problems that NAMO acknowledges but refuses to do anything about. Customer service with NAMO is non-existant.
   
   WebEditor crashes -- a lot. I checked the NAMO site forum (...) and found that many users have multiple complaints of bugs with this software. For example, paragraphs often don't wrap and have to be totally reconstructed in another software and cut and pasted back into the editor. It removes spacing and spontaneously changes line spacing. While I have never crashed when working strictly in the HTML mode, the program constantly crashes and loses data while working in the WYSIWYG editor mode -- and WYSI NOT What you get. What you see in the "preview" is rarely what you see once your site is published. Columns shift, spacing disappears, etc.
   
   When you are in a table, if you try to block highlight a paragraph including the font tag of the previous paragraph and hit delete you will crash your software program every single time. Not good for when you are moving things around or cutting and pasting.
   
   Another problem with the software is that for no apparent reason users get a "cannot read memory" error specifically linked to the NAMO software (it even asks if you wish to debug NAMO WE 6.0) Ha. Another funny is thing is that when you go to the NAMO site to try and email a complaint they have bugs in their own website!
   
   What you might save in time (easy to learn) and money you will more than pay for in countless hours of frustration and lost data. Trust me, you will end up tossing NAMO out and going out and ubying something else instead.



4. BIG SIGH. Bought Namo WebEditor6 just 2 days ago. Seemed to run fine. Then voila. Problem after problem. Too many to list and so frustrated now I just want to chuck it. This thing crash and burns more than Zeros in TORA! TORA! TORA! Words won't wrap or just the opposite. Theyruntogetherlikethis. The java buttons tend to replace eachother so your links are all messed up. A waste of money...and FrontPage is wayyy too expensive. So, I thought I'd try NAMO. How messed up could it be? I thought. Well, I'll tell ya that you don't want to know. Save your money. Even the manuals print is kind of shoddy. This thing is a POS. Nice box though.



5. Despite the accusation of "suspect reviews" there are some of us out here who get along just fine with Namo. I'm an author who does my own web page as well as the web page for my skating club, and I paid real money for Namo 4.0 and its subsequent versions. I'm by no means a professional web-page designer, but for these personal projects, Namo has been a great asset.
   
   I've given the program only three stars, simply because I think it's good but not great. By comparison, I know of no web design program I'd rate higher, and I'd give Front Page two stars max.
   
   As with any web editing program, it helps if you know some basic HTML. If you're a newbie trying to find a cheap means of making a complex webpage without doing any homework, you're going to get yourself into trouble with any program. Don't blame Namo. Invest in HTML for Dummies and understand how the basic code works, particularly for page layout and picture/text juxtapositioning.
   
   And don't be afraid to experiment with adjusting the code manually. Here, that split display (which simultaneously displays both the WYSISYG layout screen and the html code) they've added to WE6 is really cool...wish I'd had that years ago. I've never experienced the kerning or wrap-around problems others have described, but in word processing programs, that's generally the result of a left-over printer code. I suspect something of the same in the described instances and would be using that split screen, looking for extraneous positioning codes.
   
   Again...retension of extraneous code is not a problem unique to Namo. Just be glad that (unlike some other programs) you can actually access and edit that code directly.
   
   If you're wanting to fill your page with bells and whistles, I honestly don't know how well Namo works. Java script is still not welcomed by all consumers, so I tend to stay away from it. I've seen some amazing pages done exclusively on Namo, however, so it must not be totally inadequate to the task.
   
   I wrote my original page the old-fashioned way: in HTML. Even then, it was a fairly complex page layout. I imported it into Front Page, and when that program insisted on taking over every aspect of internet communication, and totally violated the page with masses of unnecessary code specifically for FP's control, I dumped it fast. I've used later versions of Front Page and still don't like it, though I acknowledge it works well for some.
   
   I got Namo 4.0 from Jasc as a sample with Paint Shop Pro, and have used it ever since. It works quietly, publishes smoothly, and converted my imported 5.5 pages to 6 without any problems. When I've had pages I changed from a different computer, it has successfully recognized those changes and synchronized my home version with the onsite version.
   
   Does it have bugs? Sure it does. So does Front Page and every other program ever written. As for customer service . . . if any company, hardware or software has decent support these days, I've not been fortunate enough to encounter it. Oh...I take that back. Linksys was fantastic. However, I've always gotten more help from the real people using programs than from the companies producing them.
   
   But if you want something that will get a nice looking page up for you with a miniumum of fuss and at a reasonable price, you could do worse than Namo's WebEditor.

5 comments about Animal SiteMaker Pro - Business Websites.

1. I'm not sure if the program does everything as listed in the description, because I never used it once I put the CD in the drive. I was looking for a program with customizable templates to make a web page to upload to my own webspace, under my own domain.
   
   When I put the disk in, it told me to make sure I was connected to the Internet before continuing. It then asks you to put in the Product Key Code, and finally, asks you some questions to "create your account." At this point, you are on the Internet at this company's site. So, this is where I quit...I believe now, after reading through the books and online information, what you are doing, in fact, is using this software to create a webpage on their webspace. I did not see a way of making web pages for your own personal space.
   
   So, if all you are looking for is a program to create HTML web pages for your own space, this program will not do it. Sorry for the 1 star, but since the description was incomplete when I purchased it, I now have to return it and look for a different program.



2. This program is not a regular software like MS Frontpage for creating websites. You can only create web pages on their website. AND YOU MUST PAY THE HOSTING FEES EVERY MONTH. You will not be able to create web pages for IntRAnet. I do not understand what a customer gets by buying this software at all. What they are trying to sell is a subscription. It is a stupid trick and this software is a shame. You will be wasting your money by buying this. Amazon must discontinue holding this software.



3. Don't buy it. It is not a software. It is a subscription.
   You will have to host the web pages only at their website and you must pay $14.99 per month for that.



4. I think most people would agree this software is a fraud. As the other reviews state, the "software" is not a program, but rather a link to the websiteanimal web site, where I am guessing you can get a "free trial" to the hosting service because you purchased this nearly BLANK CD.
   
   While the box and product description state you can create a web site, that is not true. As far as I can tell, the only thing you can do with this CD is link to their web site, and enter the key on the CD to get a "free hosting trial" which of course is also untrue because the CD has to be bought.
   
   The CD does not allow the user to download any programs to the computer, as far as I can tell. In my opinion this makes it like any hosting service with built-in tools.



5. I wish I had read the reviews before I purchased this product.
   It is not what I assumed it would be. Linking only to the web
   site of Site Maker Pro is useless.
   I could have joined my Chamber of Commerce and linked to their site with a much larger viewing audience.
   I am new to web site building and have learned my lesson
   at a cost.

No comments about Macromedia Dreamweaver 3, Fireworks 3, Studio, the Complete Solution for Professional Web Site Design and Production.

No comments about Stealthray Deluxe.

5 comments about PC-cillin Internet Security 2004 [Old Box].

1. This program is not good.Caused my system to crash.Trend Micro tech support is no good.



2. Like others, this software caused my system to shut down. After two months, my computer was full of Adware and Spyware, as a matter of fact, it had over 600 of them!! I had to take it to a professional to clean out my system and trust me i lost a lot of old programs in the process. I have decided that Anti-Virus ware is just a hoax. I didn't have it on my old computer for four years, and never got a virus. Then I installed a scanner, and then I got viruses and Spyware. I believe the Antispyware and Antivirus ware BRING viruses to your computer by creating them, then you have to keep buying more of thier lameass products because you believe that they help. BULL!!
   I am better off not having anything, rather then this piece of junk!!!
   Unfriendly staff, and i had to spend over $100 on repairs...



3. I'm really not sure what all the hoopala is about this product. Under it's "protection" I ended up with an "infection" that ultimately caused my PC to stop functioning altogether (and yes, I religiously downloaded the updates). Luckily, I managed to save my data. While this was happening I was trying to get some help from the Trend Micro support organization. I had escalated the problem and went through many push-ups to provide the information they requested. In the end, they stonewalled my case while I watched my PC die on the vine. Had I known they didn't care I wouldn't have bothered. I had naively thought they might care to find out what was infecting my PC so that they could apply the knowledge gained to other customers. After all, that IS their BUSINESS. I'll take Norton back thank you very much.



4. I have given this 3 stars as I haven't installed it yet.
   
   I recently ordered this product as I had a problem with my Norton updates (they work now) searched the web and found that this product is highly recommended.
   
   I am now slightly aprehensive, possibly even scared as the title suggests, because after reading the reviews on this site I have noticed a lot of 5 star and many 1 or 2 star reviews. The problem is a large proportion of the 5 star reviews are by 'A Software User'. I suspect that 'A Software User' eats his or her lunch in the Trend Micro canteen. If this is correct then the overall legitimate rating of this software looks pretty bad.
   
   I don't know how fast I'll be loading this software now, will I experience 5 star results or disasterous 1 star results?



5. I have had both Norton and McAfee products before purchasing this product. Both feel short in many areas. Based upon a magazine review I purchased this product in the Summer of 2004.
   
   This is the best security software for the home user. With an easy setup procedure and powerful tools, this software is the best for protecting your home network or computer. It is now January of 2005 and I have had zero incidents.
   
   PC-cillin constantly updates to protect from new threats on the Internet. This is what I like about this product. It updates itself and is ever vigilant against the nasties floating out in cyberspace.
   
   Other reviewers have commented on bad technical support, but I have not had any problems with the online technical support. I am unable to comment on the efficiency of their telephone support.

5 comments about eTrust PestPatrol 2005 Anti-Spyware.

1. I was not that impressed by this product. It found some spyware, but I found "Scan Spyware" [...] software to be much more comprehensive and offer better protection. I am in no way affiliated with that company, I just like their product.



2. This was once the best Antispyware program by far, but now that Computer Associates bought it and produced version 5. I must now try to find a new program to use. The user interface is now absolutly terrible and licensing checks every time the program is started is totaly annoying. This should now be put in the dumper along with CA's EZtrust products. Stay Away!!



3. No single anti spyware program will find everything. But the sure bets are: Pay programs: Etrust's Pest Patrol, Webroots Spy Sweeper.
   
   Free Programs: Ad Aware, Spybot Search and Destroy, and Microsoft's Beta Anti-Spyware... I have all of these.
   
   E-trust seems to keep more up to date than most. It is SUPER FAST at scanning ( the quick scan ), and detects a lot that none of the others will.
   
   It's had great reviews by Maximum PC. I reccommend it in conjunction with the others listed above, as just 1 is too few.
   
   Cons: It may be a little (slighty) non=user friendly. It just takes looking at all the options in (all the buttons) to be sure you're scanning what you want. The quick scan will scan target areas, but its good to do a full system scan when you first purchase it. You'll need to select your hard drive (s) to do this and other locations... but you should be fine in finding how to do this.
   
   Overall Grade: A



4. I installed Pest Patrol last year and it was fairly easy to use but I found the interface to be lame and the instructions confusing at times. When my subscription expired I tried CounterSpy which detected nearly 200 Spyware/Adware infections immediately after a Pest Patrol scan. CounterSpy also removed several hijacking problems that Pest Patrol did not. The CounterSpy interface is easy to use and understand is way ahead of Pest Patrol in this regard. I also use the free version of Ad-Aware and my PC has been running great. I run XP and have had no problems although I have heard of problems with other OS's.



5. Just purchased 2 of these at my local store, one for my daughter, one for myself..loaded it on my computer with three different users and will only work when the main user is logged on not the other two..ran the program says didn't find anything...ran free downloads from other antispyware sites and they came up with more then 20 bad objects...my daughter runs her pest patrol and comes up with nothing found..did the same thing with free scans and over 50 on hers..and she stills gets tons of pop-ups with "pest-patrol) on her system..contacted customer service (as bad as dell..all india people no americans)..emailed customer service still waiting for a reply after two weeks... WARNING DO NOT PURCHASE THIS... A BIG WASTE OF MONEY..those crooks at CA should go to jail for having such a BAD product on the market and ripping people off...The free stuff on the internet is better then this crap..take my word for it..you will be sorry if you buy this!!!