No comments about Microsoft FrontPage 98.

No comments about Bitdefender Internet Security 2009 1Yr/1Pc.

5 comments about FileMaker Pro 7.

1. As a novice user, with practically no knowledge of computer programming and scripting, I would like to say that Filemaker is one of the easiest databases I have ever used. I started out using Filemaker4 - this had its limitations, but the fact that I could easily and efforlessly create a whole database with functional buttons and easy links to other layouts was so great!
   
   It is relatively foolproof for those who do not wish to overload their minds with programming data that they will probably never use (and they only need to pay the cost of the package instead of the programmers they would probably need to employ in order to keep their database up and running flawlessly; with no disrespect to you programmers out there - I wish I could BEGIN to understand the way it all works, but some of us are not blessed with the time or technological knowhow that some take for granted - but I do understand why you are frustrated by the simplicity - remember that for those who need it, Filemaker does the basic database job, in a more simplified manner).
   
   I give 4 stars because, although user friendly, there are annoying limitations that have been noted before - ie: multiple layouts for manual change each time IS annoying, auto saving with no "undo" option is dangerous for larger databases etc.
   
   In summary, I feel that Filemaker is an excellent ready-prepared database solution for any individual or business that requires the "quick-fix" Filemaker offers so easily.



2. FileMaker is perhaps the easiest application to use for creating a simple database. But, there are a few quirks about this software that really bug me:
   
   1. Danger of storing layouts, scripts, and data in the same file
   
   Layouts and scripts are stored in the same file as the data. If FileMaker crashes while editing a layout or modifying a script, the whole file including the data may become corrupt and unaccessible. A better design, in my opinion, would be to keep the data separate from the layouts and scripts, so the data would be protected in an event of a crash.
   
   2. Danger of linking to wrong external relational files
   
   Filemaker links to externally related files by an unusual search algorithm. If there exists copies of files with the same file name on the server, on the local hard disk, or hosted on other hosts, then which file is linked becomes ambiguous. The wrong external file may be linked.
   
   3. Danger of opening the wrong file
   
   Each Filemaker application can host files. If a user were to host a file that has the same name as a file hosted on the server, other users may open the wrong file.
   
   4. Danger of deleting your entire database
   
   The "Delete All Records..." option is one of the most dangerous features of FileMaker. Many databases were wiped out because a user accidently chose the "Delete All Records..." rather than the "Delete Record..." option -- the two options are placed next to each other in the menu, inviting disaster.
   
   5. Cumbersome queries
   
   The querying feature of FileMake can be a pain to use. To create a query such as (Field1 = "criterion1" and (Field2 = "criterion2" or Field3 = "criterion3" or FieldN = "criterionN")), FileMaker requires you to break down the above query as N-1 queries: (Field1 = "criterion1" and Field2="criterion2"), new query (Field1 = "criterion1" and Field3 = "criterion3"), ..., new query (Field1 = "criterion1" and FieldN = "criterionN"). There are other queries that can be easily posed as a SQL statement but not so easily done in FileMaker.
   
   6. Spaghetti code paradigm
   
   Variables for your scripts in FileMaker are stored in global fields. You'll have to keep track of which scripts are using what global fields -- the script and the variables are not kept together. Passing parameters to scripts is a cumbersome sequence of setting the global fields one-by-one, then calling the script. Most modern programming languages have procedures with calling convention such as p(x,y). In FileMaker it's set x, set y, perform p. To debug, you'll have to read the code of p to see that p really references x and y. Also, their is no hierarchy or encapsulation of scripts, so you'll have to devise your own way for organizing.



3. 
   A good deal of what people have written about this product simply isn't true, particularly negative observations such as not being able to import/export or that security is non-existent. Why people with only cursory knowledge speak with such authority has always puzzled me. So I offer an objective, if lengthy, review.
   
   I've been using FileMaker since 1990. Developing FileMaker applications has been my primary source of income for almost as long. I develop in Mac OS X (Virtual PC with Windows 2000 Pro for testing). I've also tech edited an upcoming advanced book on FileMaker 7.
   
   Version 7 is a huge upgrade over 6 (I'd call it a 'crossgrade', as in switching to similar but different product). As such, converting solutions from 6 to 7 can get really hairy, and it may be that a complete re-write is more efficient. That said, many FileMaker solutions that people have developed or inherited over the years weren't written following "correct" database rules (this is why IT types hate FileMaker), so a re-write may be a good thing. Generally, an upgrade to 7 is brought about by a need for larger file sizes, to increase the number of simultaneously open files or to consolidate data. If you've got a solution that works fine in 6 or earlier and you're not a developer, I'd think two or three times about upgrading; it's not something you want to do for the sake of it.
   
   For users, that is people who enter data, the changes in 7 aren't apparent. It's the back end, for us developers, where the changes are significant, plentiful, and very welcome. If you're just getting started in the world of FileMaker, forget all about any earlier versions. The rules have changed in 7, and it's almost more difficult to unlearn what you know from 6 than to start fresh in 7.
   
   FileMaker has a scalar learning curve. That is, it's easy to learn and get up and running in really no time at all (and there are plenty of free sample files to take apart and learn from). As your database becomes larger, more complex and gains a need for multiple simultaneous users or interaction with other systems, knowing the normalized rules of relational database structures becomes increasingly important, and that's where the learning curve steepens. But don't let anyone fool you, this is true of *any* database development software.
   
   Building a database is a lot like being the architect of a building. You have to have a good idea of what it's going to look like in the end, before you start. For example, if you know your one-story house is one day going to be a 4-story mansion, you want to have a good foundation. If you know you might want the ability to relocate a bathroom to the other side of a floor, you've got to build in some room at least for plumbing, electricity, maybe some windows. It's not a realistic analogy, but it usually helps people understand the thinking involved around creating a database.
   
   I firmly believe FileMaker is the easiest of any to learn, use and maintain, that can also handle whatever complexity you throw at it. Further, it's cross-platform and things like networking your databases and making structural changes (even remotely, without bringing down the system) are really a breeze compared to programs like Access.
   
   Lastly, one of the neatest things about FileMaker is its developer community, which is today thriving and strong. Almost like an open-source coummunity, we seem to really enjoy helping solve each other's problems (no one person knows everything about FileMaker, even at FileMaker, Inc), so we're always learning. There's plenty of free community support available that, I've found, is often better than the company's own tech support, although the folks at FileMaker are really great and genuinely into supporting the developer community. And...there's plenty of money to be made as a FileMaker developer the world over. We're certainly in demand and have been going strong for nearly two decades.
   
   You can read FileMaker's feature list to find out about all the new features. Here are my likes and dislikes:
   
   What I like most about 7:
   
   * Multiple tables in one file (with an 8 terabyte limit per file; formerly 2GB).
   * Multiple windows from the same file, and the ability to manage their placement dynamically, down to the pixel.
   * The ability to separate data from logic (for example, keep your data in one file, and all your scripts and interface elements in another...changes and solution upgrades to your clients are much easier to facilitate this way).
   * Much improved security and account management (that supposedly plays well in authenticated corporate environments...I'm just getting started in this area).
   * The ability to use PNG images with transparency, which greatly improves what you can do with your interface.
   
   
   What I DON'T like about 7:
   
   * All my complaints boil down to FileMaker's interface. I strongly believe a complete overhaul is way overdue (if it were like Omni Graffle, I'd be in heaven). There are plenty of little annoyances because I use a Mac. For example, I have a Microsoft 5-button optical mouse. The scroll wheel, which works in every single application (even on FileMaker for Windows using Virtual PC on my G5), doesn't work at all in FileMaker for OS X. This is ironic because FileMaker is wholly owned by Apple, but development for the Mac seems have been an afterthought. Much of this will change in the next version, just around the corner. I wouldn't dream of developing primarily in Windows, largely because of the way Windows OS handles windows and value lists within FileMaker; you have less room to work with.
   
   * The relationships graph, which sort of looks like an ER (entity relationship) diagram but is not, can get messy very quickly, and they've taken away the ability to look at relationships in a straight text list (I'd like both). This can get frustrating, especially if you've inherited someone else's mess. The fact that FileMaker has implemented a certification program for developers, and is working actively on releasing development standards will help reduce confusion and frustration in this area.
   
   * The inability to move tables, fields, script steps, etc. from one table or file to another. Improvements in this area are expected in the next version.
   
   * The inability to see how elements are related to each other. For example, it's not possible to see all the elements that call a script (i.e. a parent script or button, etc.). There are software tools that can analyze FileMaker files and expose this information, and they work great, but it would be nice if it were integrated into the program itself.
   
   * It's a minor complaint, but worth addressing here: A number of things don't work like you'd expect or want them to, so you have to create workarounds. This appeals to the geek in me; I usually like the challenge, but sometimes it's frustrating because you'll think it's silly that something simply doesn't work like you want. That said, over the years there is nothing, really nothing in terms of complexity that I have not been able to achieve with FileMaker by itself or with the help of a plug-in. People ask me "Is it possible in FileMaker to..." I always answer yes before they're finished. It's sometimes a "Yes, but..." answer. For the snotty programmer types, I challenge anyone to name database development software that is impervious to workarounds, OR that does not have a high learning curve. If you don't have a background in databases, FileMaker is a great path. If you do have such a background, open your mind and you'll find that no, FileMaker is not the end-all-be-all database app (such an app doesn't exist), but it really is a neat and productive tool, and if you can build good solutions that manage your client's data, they will loyally worship you.



4. I just upgraded to version 7. Every other negative comment made by others here is true, plus they just do NOT answer e-mails. I was unable to register my upgrade copy. I sent four e-mails and not a single one was answered. I finally called and was told there was a bug in the registraion of "some" copies and not to type my name in the name field, but my company name and leave the company field blank. Yup, that worked.
   
   Now, if the registration is that buggy, they have no e-mail customer support, and the upgrades are OUTRAGEOUSLY expensive (and see other reviews for lack of fit and finnish), why would you buy it? I'm very sorry I did.
   
   File Maker 8 is coming out and the upgrade is $179. I'd rather use shareware.



5. I just upgraded to version 7. Every other negative comment made by others here is true, plus they just do NOT answer e-mails. I was unable to register my upgrade copy. I sent four e-mails and not a single one was answered. I finally called and was told there was a bug in the registraion of "some" copies and not to type my name in the name field, but my company name and leave the company field blank. Yup, that worked.
   
   Now, if the registration is that buggy, they have no e-mail customer support, and the upgrades are OUTRAGEOUSLY expensive (and see other reviews for lack of fit and finnish), why would you buy it? I'm very sorry I did.
   
   File Maker 8 is coming out and the upgrade is $179. I'd rather use shareware.

5 comments about Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Standard [OLD VERSION].

1. I didn't encounter any problems with this product infact it was much easier to use and it allows you to combine and orginaze text files, chart spreadsheets, drawings, PDF documents and more into a single compressed package with advanced security features it also has many tools, overall this product was fantastic and I cannot recommend this highly enough. The interface and toolbars might be annoying but that is just a slight problem since it can be taken down and become more user friendly. The other reviewers who complained about this being slower need to know that this is just the standard edition which I use, there is a better edition which is The Professional Full Product of Adobe Acrobat 7.0 that also includes an upgrade.....



2. I assumed, incorrectly, that Adobe's customer service would be professional and quick. I have called three times in the past two weeks and have had to wait, at a minimum, 23 MINUTES just to speak to someone.
   When I finally got my product, they sent the Mac verion rather than the PC version I purchased. I called again and waited approximately 30 MINUTES to get customer help. I had originally ordered the PC Standard version and asked to upgrade (and pay difference) for the Professional version -- since I still hadn't received the PC version. Customer service stated that they would ONLY ship me the Standard version to replace the incorrectly shipped Mac Version and then I would have to wait for the Standard verison to arrive at which point I could call again, and ask to exchange for the Professional verion - INSANE!!! Adobe's call center is easily the worst customer service I have dealt with -- and I've dealt with some bad customer service.



3. This will be my last Adobe software. Changed to a new laptop and deactivated and activated to my new new laptop. Now every time I start it needs reactivation. I have disabled outgoing internet access in my firewall from programs like Acrobat because Adobe's habit of doing push marketing into their software. But that screws up the reactivation and you cannot use the software. When I tried the phone automated reactivation, it refused the numbers that the program gave me to enter! The customer service will want an e-mail address to send you a patch to "fix" the reactivation problem and they asked me for phone number as well!
   
   The choice for Adobe is simple, stop doing your push marketing into your software that I pay money to acquire and I will forgive your problems with reactivation. You cannot have your cake and eat it too inconveniencing legitimate users of your software. Adobe has not learnt from Intuit obviously.



4. After buying Adobe Acrobat Std 7 and installing it (tediously I might add); I proceeded happily for ~1 year. Then it quit working!!.. After opening a .pdf file it qould simply stop and terminate!!, no amount of searching gave me any clue, reinstalling severtal times gave me no differnt result. My advice.. save your money. Use Adobe 5 until they have fixed all their glitches...



5. The software arrived in two days in the original packing. Fast response and delivery. 100% satisfied!

5 comments about Adobe Creative Suite CS3 Web Premium [OLD VERSION].

1. I gave this product 5 stars because it is the best available resource for creating complex web sites. I was able to create and place a site including video and other advanced features.
   
   Having said that however, the documentation and help provided by Adobe is sorely lacking. In order to effectively use all the tools contained in Web Premium CS3 make sure to purchase the "Missing Manual" series of books as well. Relying on Adobe documentation and assistance will prove to be very frustrating.



2. Pretty straight forward...
   
   Adobe CS3 Web Premium is one of the most important toolsets of the trade. Buying directly from Amazon is one of the most comfortable (and affordable) places to buy online.
   
   Reviews are great, but if you really want to see if this package is right for you:
   
   1) Read through Adobe's site for each of the included products. Learn what's new and what you can benefit from. Find out which tools will best help you explore your potential and develop your passion.
   
   2) Download a demo
   3) Find a healthy handful of tutorials that you're interested in
   4) Mess around and see what happens
   
   CS3 is awesome!



3. The software is great and almost a neccessaty in todays design world. I still would beware of the Express shipping as they use UPS. I would give the sofware 4 stars and shippin 1 star but can't edit my rating, only the review.



4. I am enjoying using this product overall... but I am having some major issues with using Adobe Acrobat 8. It keeps telling me to re-install the program to be able to use the features (like importing a word document to create a new form). I downloaded updates, etc.. and nothing seems to work. (I use Windows XP). It's extremely frustrating since Acrobat was one of the reasons I chose to buy the "Creative Suite" rather than just the individual programs I needed.



5. I've been using Photoshop, Illustrator, Flash & Dreamweaver for over 5 years now.
   
   These applications have always excelled at what they do, and this package is no exception. It's also stable, and after 4 weeks I've had no crashing issues (be sure your computer meets or even tops the minimum system requirements).
   
   The major "upgrade" I was expecting in this CS3 package was cross-application compatibility. To an extent that has been accomplished (the "relationship" between Dreamweaver & Photoshop is now very user-friendly and time-saving for example). But I was still expecting a little more integration between the others and would be unsure to upgrade from CS2 had it not been for Action script 3 and the range of applications (like many have said, it's a HUGE INVESTMENT for any freelancer \ small company).
   
   I still miss ImageReady, though, and Adobe Bridge is something I'd rather live without.
   
   That said, this is an essential product for anyone designing & developing websites or other creative content for the web (or print).

No comments about Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9.0 Professional Edition.

5 comments about Philips DJ Style HiFi Stereo Headphone - HP430.

1. The headphones are awesome. The bass reflex is great for headphones this size and price. They have great range of motion and durability. When I use them the background noise is almost noexistant. Good for all types of music. I love them.



2. Really awful headphones, this is my third time replacing them! The connection to the mini jack shorts after awhile and the swivel where the speakers attach to the head band breaks apart.. Happend three times to the same model..



3. I paid full price for these at Best Buy, and I have already returned one pair to the manufacturer that literally fell to pieces in my hands for no reason. Now my second pair has abruptly stopped working too; the sound cut out for no reason in one ear. They were working fine 24 hours ago when I was wearing them in bed to watch something on my computer. I put them on my desk, put them on last night to wear them out of the house, and all of a sudden Houston, we have a problem.
   
   Not only are the headphones themselves awful; the people at the company are awful too. I got into a fight with the guy who was in charge of orchestrating the first replacement because they forced me to pay my own shipping to get the headphones replaced.
   
   I simply cannot say enough terrible things about this product and this company. I will never buy Phillips again as long as I live, and I heartily encourage others to do the same.



4. i am rough on headphones and these have been holding up great. i love the sound and feel.



5. The sound on these headphones are good, I don't have a problem with that. The problem I had with the headphones is the band that fits over your head. Unlike other DJ style headphones, they don't bend to go over your head. It's just stiff, and when you adjust the length, the top just stays flat, so it looks like you're wearing a helment listening to music. I believe that when Philips was making this model of headphones, they ignored how it was supposed to fit around the head. Other than that, if you're looking for good sound, no matter how it feels on you, check these headphones out. Me, I ended up returning these and getiinga much better and confortable brand. Peace.

No comments about Web Easy Professional 6 Complete Web Design Studio.

5 comments about Norton Internet Security 2006 [OLD VERSION].

1. I got what I think was a great deal for this product. I received it in excellent condition, and have nothing but good things to say about it. Keep up the good work Amazon!



2. I liked this product so well I ordred the 2007 edition when it became available. The price is great! You get a hard copy for the price of a download.



3. Although Norton AV and System Works - actually most products I purchased from Symantec/Norton - work well... they are starting to look like dinosaurs in the market. I like that the AV component (I've used Norton AV for years, bundled or not) has let only a few pieces of non-harmful malware thru.
   
   NIS 2006 with default install leaves a lot to be desired - more updates and reboots than installing Windows itself. If you have problems, and wish to roll back (system restore), you have to uninstall the product - to completely remove its traces - it's almost easier to do a clean install of XP again.
   
   I'm not fond of any company that embeds FUD (upsell) in their products - NIS 06 is full of half-full green circles warning me I'm not fully protected or optimized, click here to (buy this or that) to fix the problem.
   
   I also have Systemworks Premiere - and after about a year and half of experience - I can only say I wish I had not bought the bundles, but the stand-alones.
   
   Although a single source vendor for PC security and utility needs is convenient... it isn't convienent when the solution becomes the problem.
   
   I hope they turn it around in 07/08.



4. I was not happy with the resource hogging nature of the software. Only used it a short while. Part of problem is it requires a large amount of RAM & my PC was a little old. Expansion helped but it still took over at times.



5. Terrible program. Always in your face, kind of like windows does but even worse. Just want to install and forget, not have to interface with every day. Really slowed down the computer. Even uninstalling this app took unbelievably long. Norton really seems to make their apps way more complicated than necessary.

1 comments about Pc-Cillin Internet Security 2007 3-User.

1. This product just "does the job", quietly in the background, without constant interruptions. In my opinion, Pc-Cillin is heads above McAfee and Norton anti-virus programs, and is much less expensive.